OLPC chairman Nicholas Negroponte has revealed that the twin-display OLPC XO-2 2.0 project has been scrapped, in favor of an updated – but cosmetically identical – revamp of the existing 1.0 XO-1 model and a new, model 3.0 that has “totally different industrial design, more like a sheet of paper”. Speaking to Xconomy, the outspoken exec also sought to redefine the initial, well-publicized aim of “the $100 laptop” in terms of total cost of ownership: $1 per child per week to buy, maintain and connect the machine.

More OLPC model 3.0 details after the cut
“Not much to say [about the OLPC model 3.0] other than its aspirational aspects: 3.0 is a single sheet, completely plastic and unbreakable, waterproof, 1/4″ thick, full color, reflective and transmissive, no bezel, no holes. 1W. $75, ready in 2012″ Nicholas Negroponte, chairman, OLPC
Whereas the model 2.0 was to have dual touchscreens and a form-factor that could be used either as a traditional laptop or as an ebook, the new model 3.0 will have a more straightforward single-sheet design. In fact it sounds a little like Plastic Logic’s ebook reader, only using a reflective/transmissive display – likely courtesy of Pixel Qi – and requiring just 1W of power.
In the meantime, the current XO-1 will see an update, with the existing processor switched out for an ARM chip. Eventually there will be a no-cost connectivity option too, though Negroponte says that has been the slowest element of the package to get up and running. He claims to have shipped 1.1m XO-1 units, with a manufacturing backlog of 400,000-700,000.
[via Slashdot]
Relevant Entries on Phone-Review
- What’s Under the hood of revised OLPC?
- CES 2008: e-detail show Tablet PC Slates with secondary touchscreen sub-displays
- OLPC XO-2 has native MultiTouch, haptic feedback likely
- OLPC to dual-boot Windows & Linux after new Microsoft deal
- Awesome Star Wars statues made from scrap
Powered by: Phone-review.org
![[Ask]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/ask.png)
![[Connotea]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/connotea.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[Friendsite]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/friendsite.png)
![[Furl]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/furl.png)
![[Google]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/google.png)
![[Mister Wong]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/misterwong.png)
![[MySpace]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[Reddit]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/reddit.png)
![[Spurl]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/spurl.png)
![[Squidoo]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/squidoo.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Twitter]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Windows Live]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/windowslive.png)
![[Yahoo!]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/yahoo.png)
![[Email]](http://www.phone-review.org/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)
Leave a comment